"By Sharon Hill via The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI) - Sounds Sciencey" " I'm taking a step beyond sciencey with the following topic. What happens when science doesn't cooperate with your subject area? Researchers of unexplained events may get frustrated and disenchanted with the scientific process when the eyewitness accounts they collect are too weird to explain via conventional means. They go unconventional. " Captain Jean-Baptiste Duhamel led the hunt for a beast that was attacking and devouring victims in the Gevaudan, France, in 1794. He had a problem. He could not catch and kill the man-eating monster. Being a proud man, he had to justify why he could not conquer this particular foe. Since the option that he was an inadequate huntsman was not acceptable, the creature "must" be supernatural in its abilities to escape his capture. The characteristics of the beast were exaggerated-it was huge, cunning, and not just an ordinary wolf. Captain Duhamel left defeated by what must truly be an extraordinary beast. Captain Jean-Baptiste Duhamel led the hunt for a beast that was attacking and devouring victims in the Gevaudan, France, in 1794. He had a problem. He could not catch and kill the man-eating monster. Being a proud man, he had to justify why he could not conquer this particular foe. Since the option that he was an inadequate huntsman was not acceptable, the creature "must" be supernatural in its abilities to escape his capture. The characteristics of the beast were exaggerated-it was huge, cunning, and not just an ordinary wolf. Captain Duhamel left defeated by what must truly be an extraordinary beast. The cognitive dissonance experienced by the French captain is reflected today by those who can't capture Bigfoot. When normal processes and causes fail to satisfactorily explain events or answers to questions, then the reasoning slips beyond nature, into super nature, beyond the testable claims of science. I call this "supernatural creep." Although, I swear I'm not the first one to name it as such. I searched to find where I have seen this referenced before. (If anyone knows, "please" email me so I can give the originator due credit.) Once I noticed this kind of reasoning, I saw it frequently. Wherever I come across this concept, it reveals a bit about human nature: "If you have to choose between the belief or a rational explanation, the rational explanation may be that which gets rejected." The effect of supernatural creep can be seen with UFOs, anomalous natural phenomena (Fortean topics), and in bizarre stories categorized as "high strangeness" (which I'll explain a bit further on in this piece). A perfect example is that of "black dogs" whose appearance is spectral or demonic and is associated with either protection from or nearness of bad spirits. Could it be just a big black dog? Witnesses perceive that it's more than that. When the circumstances feel uncanny, we slip into thoughts of the supernatural. An enjoyable book that illustrates supernatural creep quite nicely is "Three Men Seeking Monsters" by Nick Redfern. Fun stuff. With phantom black dogs, there is a connection to local legends and ghost stories. A modern example of the dispute about supernatural creep is evident in the Bigfoot/Sasquatch community. Bigfoot proponents generally fall into two camps: those who search for a real animal that functions as nature intended (called 'apers') and those who entertain the option that the entity is not natural (paranormalists). MORE...Related Articles * Foiled Again: Lake Monster, Bigfoot Body and Alien Humanoid All in One Week (illuminutti.com) * The Internet: A Superhighway of Paranormal Hoaxes and Fakelore (illuminutti.com) * Supernatural Creep (westcoastatheist.wordpress.com) * Ghost hunters find "paranormal activity" at Ramsey museum (huntspost.co.uk) * On the Natural Reality of the Supernatural (patrickcalinescu.wordpress.com) * 'Bigfoot shot dead but body disappears': Conspiracy theorists claim cops covered up proof of yeti (mirror.co.uk)
Posted in :
aliens,
cropcircles,
ufocasebook
|
