COPYRIGHT 2012, INTERAMERICA, INC.
SECRETS OF THE ICE AGE: THE Manufacture OF THE Secret place ARTISTS by Evan Hadingham [Tourist and Act, NY, 1979], pictured a cut above, makes clear that no one knows, for sure, why primitive mankind painted on hollow stockade or produced brickwork art.
And some hollow art is not representational such as this summing up side from "Abri Leuillet" in the Paris Dell, dating from the Neolithic period:
"Alert 285"
Mr. Hardingham presents the mystery of why art seems to hold waned after the Ice Age:
"Alert 267"
The propose that hollow art was totemic in model, or bent for delightful rituals is dishonorable, writes Mr. Hadingham.
Of course, gift are some totemic drawings, absolute as gift depictions of a sexual model or hunting scenes.
And the propose that such art stemmed from a pursuit, art-for-arts sake has been inferior also.
Why do I lead in presenting the hollow art scenarios here?
I take that no matter which happened that encouraged the primitive or native sensitivity, as was the case on Easter Island; that is, either paranormal, extraterrestrial, or sleight of hand (an violation by idol) agents instigated or sparked such art, doubtless by absolute being funding.
And UFOs or other-worldly beings played a moving function in this esthetic curl by upfront mankind, which vanished for a instance to show up at the plus of the Sumerian/Egyptian cultural first phase.
But if "outer layer" agents brought on the imagination, why didn't it gangster in an graphic form?
In the same way, gift is no and has been no graphic esthetic thrusts or evidence of such artistic goings-on by family beings encountered in UFO actions of the new era.
Beings imagined or real, encountered by humans, hold been cut off in their unesthetic contact.
Was the artistic shimmer lit yearn for ago and no more to geminate on its own?
Did the gods or ET interrupt globe counting an artistic DNA selflessness and as a consequence let it decline on its own, and if so, why?
Or is an outer layer grass attractive at all?
Equally caused upfront man (and new man) to draw (or paint)?
Do we push an outer layer splendidly as an explanation?
Airplane the Primeval Astronaut theorists are unenthusiastic to wax intensely about aliens inculcating art among their processes for humanity's "improvement," multifaceted the presumed primitive professional and/or architectural contribution.
But there's condescending close to....no matter which not pretty all set, about upfront mankind's refined street to side pictograms a long time ago text and dialogue were unwell developed,
And is gift a UFO tie-in?
SECRETS OF THE ICE AGE: THE Manufacture OF THE Secret place ARTISTS by Evan Hadingham [Tourist and Act, NY, 1979], pictured a cut above, makes clear that no one knows, for sure, why primitive mankind painted on hollow stockade or produced brickwork art.
And some hollow art is not representational such as this summing up side from "Abri Leuillet" in the Paris Dell, dating from the Neolithic period:
"Alert 285"
Mr. Hardingham presents the mystery of why art seems to hold waned after the Ice Age:
"Alert 267"
The propose that hollow art was totemic in model, or bent for delightful rituals is dishonorable, writes Mr. Hadingham.
Of course, gift are some totemic drawings, absolute as gift depictions of a sexual model or hunting scenes.
And the propose that such art stemmed from a pursuit, art-for-arts sake has been inferior also.
Why do I lead in presenting the hollow art scenarios here?
I take that no matter which happened that encouraged the primitive or native sensitivity, as was the case on Easter Island; that is, either paranormal, extraterrestrial, or sleight of hand (an violation by idol) agents instigated or sparked such art, doubtless by absolute being funding.
And UFOs or other-worldly beings played a moving function in this esthetic curl by upfront mankind, which vanished for a instance to show up at the plus of the Sumerian/Egyptian cultural first phase.
But if "outer layer" agents brought on the imagination, why didn't it gangster in an graphic form?
In the same way, gift is no and has been no graphic esthetic thrusts or evidence of such artistic goings-on by family beings encountered in UFO actions of the new era.
Beings imagined or real, encountered by humans, hold been cut off in their unesthetic contact.
Was the artistic shimmer lit yearn for ago and no more to geminate on its own?
Did the gods or ET interrupt globe counting an artistic DNA selflessness and as a consequence let it decline on its own, and if so, why?
Or is an outer layer grass attractive at all?
Equally caused upfront man (and new man) to draw (or paint)?
Do we push an outer layer splendidly as an explanation?
Airplane the Primeval Astronaut theorists are unenthusiastic to wax intensely about aliens inculcating art among their processes for humanity's "improvement," multifaceted the presumed primitive professional and/or architectural contribution.
But there's condescending close to....no matter which not pretty all set, about upfront mankind's refined street to side pictograms a long time ago text and dialogue were unwell developed,