In Peter Kolosimo's "Spaceships in Prehistory" (noted in the sphere of in a fundamental location) are these two pictorials of ancient drawings on sanctum walls:
Such images are cast-off by Primal Astronaut theorists to go for that the pictures express extraterrestrials wearing space helmets, comparable population cast-off by today's Earthian astronauts.
The extraterrestrials, obviously couldn't be alive Earth's oxygen-rich air, for instance they visited eons ago.
Nonetheless, today's accepted extraterrestrial guests - the supposed "grays" - don't regard helmets, as they are harshly spotted lacking any.
Why would this be?
Furthermore, why would AA's space guests be wearing space belongings comparable that of Earth's Twentieth Century space travelers, but not whatever thing a little senior advanced?
It's novel.
Along with, but I start again my reading of Kevin Randle's very sensational book, "Reflections of a UFO Examiner", I log on a case consideration on Inferior 50 about an nameless farmer who, among manifold others, found strange, in a circle depressions in his fields.
But this fellow besides saw an elliptical craft, from which emerged two indiscernible entities (and departed amid a blue-flame propulsion pack):
Mr. Randle cites the Lonnie Zamora sighting from 10 existence in the past, and wonders if the farmer was gossip a chronicle based on that famous sighting.
Being maneuverings me is that the farmer's elliptical craft was worn, by the farmer, amid the egg bump desirable on landing legs, not incongruent out of the ordinary sighting noted in the past in the sphere of.
Zamora's craft was worn amid the elliptical craft degree, not desirable (firm to the La Madera craft seen in the exceedingly time-frame - 1964):
Why would a hoaxer not declare the Zamora drawing if they were by the use of that sighting as the guide for their fraud?
Or did Zamora bear it wrong?
Suitable wondering....
RR
