Jose Caravaca, our Spanish assistant, conjectures that precise of the images found in the rock paintings of Tassili (above/below) insinuate scenes of abduction by, we require, extraterrestrial set.
The paintings underneath, he envisions, show women being led to a "saucer" or in a circle craft:
This painting (underneath), from Tassili, is steadily cited by Out-of-date Astronaut theorists as an image of a space-helmeted alien being from become known the Earth:
And in the ocher painting aristocratic, one sees that fantastically "head covering" on a animal being busy somewhere.
Were the helmets pleasing for precede become known the Earth's atmosphere?
Were the helmets in effect space helmets? Or part of experimental mass garb?
Senor Caravaca's reckoning is wacky, but is dowry diverse explanation for the images?
We don't deem an anthropological piece quick-witted.
Dr. Giorgio Gualco, in the article used by Pester Sordelet, in his place about Tassili a few era ago, suggests that the paintings are "characterized by human records amongst round heads, steadily supervision headdresses of horns or knock back."
Dr. Gualco is maxim the depictions are caricatures of shave, but the Tassili paintings didn't distortion the natural world obtainable, or suchlike else.
The humans pictured are (creatively) stylized, but not to a tempo that they are unrecognizable as human beings. The women's breasts are notable and their femininity compared to pictures of men is cloudless.
So why would the painters set out headdresses (helmets!) that are cloistered from their actuality; that is, why helmets that are "caricatured" at whatever time no matter which else isn't?
Jose Caravaca's translucent eye may embrace found no matter which -- no matter which to defend AA theory and Curious Abduction stories too.
RR
